Test Vivo X100 Pro Audio

Kładziemy Vivo
W tej recenzji omówimy jego działanie w różnych testach i kilku typowych przypadkach użycia.

Przegląd

Kluczowe specyfikacje audio obejmują:

• Dwa głośniki (przedni górny pod ekranem, dolny bok)
• Brak wyjścia audio typu jack

Odtwarzanie

Rejestracja

With a SBMARK Audio score of 134, the Vivo X100 Pro delivered fairly average performance in our tests. Distortion was noticeable when playing audio at high volumes, but our audio experts liked the solid tonal performance when playing at nominal volume, despite the lack of bass extension. The recording performance was overall very constant and the timbre transmitted by the microphones was considered particularly pleasant and natural. Thanks to effective wind noise reduction, the X100 Pro performed very well when recording in windy conditions, but the Vivo is one of the few Ultra-Premium phones not to offer an audio zoom function.

In playback tests, the X100 Pro performed better for gaming, but results were close when listening to music or watching movies. Recording scores were higher when using the Memo app. Selfie videos were about the same level, but main camera videos and meeting room recordings fell slightly lower.

Podsumowanie testu

Informacje o testach audio SBMARK: W celu oceny i analizy w naszych recenzjach audio smartfonów inżynierowie SBMARK przeprowadzają serię obiektywnych testów i przeprowadzają ponad 20 godzin oceny percepcyjnej w kontrolowanych warunkach laboratoryjnych.
(Aby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat naszego protokołu odtwarzania, kliknij tutaj; aby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat naszego protokołu nagrywania, kliknij tutaj.)
W poniższej sekcji zebrano kluczowe elementy naszych kompleksowych testów i analiz przeprowadzonych w laboratoriach SBMARK. Szczegółowe oceny wyników w formie raportów są dostępne na żądanie. Nie wahaj się z nami skontaktować.

In our tests, the Vivo X100 Pro delivered an overall decent tone, with great treble extension and a decent midrange but only average bass. Dynamic performance was good, thanks to decent attack and good bass precision and power. The built-in speakers offered a good sense of spaciousness in all use cases. Thanks to the wide stereo soundstage, even individual sound sources were easy to locate. Both distance and depth rendering were quite accurate.

Our testers found that the minimum volume setting was slightly too low, which made it difficult to hear low-volume passages in highly dynamic content, such as classical music. Maximum volume was quite good, but the distribution of volume levels from minimum to maximum could have been more consistent. In terms of playback artifacts, the Vivo delivered an average performance. At nominal volume it seemed free of artifacts. However, at maximum volume, our testers noticed high levels of distortion when gaming, watching movies, or playing music. While gaming, it was quite easy to accidentally cover the right speaker. That said, the effect on sound quality was rather negligible.

Posłuchaj wydajności odtwarzania testowanego smartfona w porównaniu z niektórymi jego konkurentami:

Oto jak Vivo X100 Pro radzi sobie z odtwarzaniem w porównaniu z konkurencją:

Oto kilka poziomów ciśnienia akustycznego (SPL) mierzonych podczas odtwarzania naszych przykładowych nagrań muzyki hip-hopowej i klasycznej przy maksymalnej głośności:

Poniższy wykres pokazuje stopniowe zmiany objętości od minimum do maksimum. Oczekujemy, że zmiany te będą spójne w całym asortymencie, tak aby wszystkie wzrosty wolumenów odpowiadały oczekiwaniom użytkowników:

In recording tests, the X100 Pro offered a satisfying tonal balance in urban environments, with a natural and pleasant midrange. In both urban and domestic scenarios, the timbre however seemed to lack clarity and brightness. When recording loud events, such as concerts, tonal balance remained good, but our experts noted superior treble. Tonal balance consistency was good across all test use cases, regardless of the app or camera used. The device offered an efficient signal-to-noise ratio in most test scenarios, and concert recordings highlighted sharp attacks and accurate envelope.

The recorded sound stage was quite large with the main camera but noticeably reduced when recording a selfie video, as on many smartphones. Remote performance was good in all use cases. In our real-life tests recordings were perceived as nice and loud with the main camera and memo apps, but slightly quieter with the front camera. That said, our lab measurements showed slightly weaker loudness performance. On the plus side, the Vivo is particularly resistant to high sound pressure levels, which can occur at noisy events, such as concerts. Unwanted artifacts were controlled well during recording, with only some slight clipping on screaming vocals and very subtle compression on recordings at high sound pressure levels. The background was quite natural, thanks mainly to a balanced midrange. However, a little more presence in the upper spectrum would have been welcome.

Oto jak Vivo X100 Pro radzi sobie z nagrywaniem w porównaniu z konkurencją:

Oto poziomy dźwięku zapisane w plikach audio i wideo, mierzone w LUFS (pełna skala jednostki głośności); Dla porównania, spodziewamy się, że poziomy głośności w przypadku nagranych treści będą przekraczać -24 LUFS:

W tym porównaniu audio można usłyszeć, jak ten smartfon radzi sobie z szumem wiatru w porównaniu do konkurentów:

macierz(3) {
[„Vivo X100 Pro”]=> string(65) „zasoby/Vivo/X100ProV2.2/VivoX100ProV22_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Xiaomi 13T”]=> string(69) “resources/Vivo/X100ProV2.2/XiaomiXiaomi13TV22_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[„Google Pixel 8”]=> string(66) „resources/Vivo/X100ProV2.2/GooglePixel8V22_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a” }